After I've already received some letters and it's getting louder in forums that the headwind of Schall & Rauch concerns, I will personally take all for me under the microscope. The operator of the site should not take it personally when I make known my freedom of speech, after all, he's a great friend of free speech and opponents of the strict censorship. Incidentally, I also can read about each of my blog comment, even if he does then. And the highlight of the matter with me ... you need a Google account, even if the operator propagated that there will be an advantage. I beg to differ! You also have to enter any codes for me to comment. On the contrary => like the old days simply write the comment, and then he stands there. I will not at all control and release because this is a comment too much hassle for me and for those who are. So if you like me complaining that he has too little free time and places great value on freedom of expression that goes with this step and thus the risk that any untruths are disseminated. These are must! One has the opportunity to respond, or to ignore it. People seek to make a blog, the ticks have any idea how the operator, at least if they are a bit longer here and look at the read blog sometimes critical, instead of taking every word at face value. A headwind is dearer to me than a "Wow, class, Hey."
The problem with the whole matter of the censorship of comments is that the writers by censoring big trouble comes up, because what was written, not published, so censored, but there is no comment and criticism is allowed only in selected cases. What really goes in depth and bring light into the dark would be so and the search for truth that is easily avoided. Either can be aware of any criticism to maintain an image with the motto: "Super topics, always fresh, good people on it, all dancing to a pipe, stick together, WOW!", Or you afraid of something? (Pure speculation)
=> This has nothing to do with a group. In a group there is always friction and supplying these are the ones who read the group grow. It grows out of compromises, especially when supposedly give greater the supposedly weaker right or even ask for advice. In a true group everyone is respected. There is no comparison "better", "worse". There will be pulled together and that of the "better" and "weaker" because each carries its own advantages and disadvantages, but are accepted in a group, the disadvantages and advantages batched. This way, you need no chief. Also, an Indian group which brings to balance => without also chief. The group is the chief.
Back to the topic, not that means it afterwards I'm talking about the bush or have no evidence:
Going to something like this with friends? Especially people who have torn up the ass in Greece? But most of all your pictures, videos, etc., spread to capitalize on it, and it is their property?
One can only speculate how it came about that the tide is turning, but nourishes this fact to my hardening suspicion should serve interests who, above all, issues have been known since at least 2001, if you want to look for .. .
If now "friends" already arguing, then a lot of fun when the "group" wants to achieve something. So there is no ... before the especially not when people advocate things themselves and not one bit better and takes up almost exactly this phrase in an article.
perfect Nobody is or how it was so beautiful! Sure, but you should have to listen to his readers, or read the comments, and the critical.
Or perhaps to keep to the incorrigible?
